Archive for June, 2007

Machine intelligence – where did it go?

Fiction has tended to regard artificial intelligence as a threat or challenge to humanity. The science fiction film 2001 Space Oddessy has the computer HAL (one letter back in the alphabet from IBM) plotting to dispose of its human copilots that it despised. Blockbusters such as the Matrix and Terminator are similarly distopian. Stephen Speilberg’s AI is unusual in that it is the machine (in a human embodiment) that is persecuted. But if fiction needs big narratives to make a point, reality tends to be more complex and ambiguous, and where the value of machine intelligence is contested.

The impressive growth in the sophistication of computer technology through the latter part of the 20th century coupled with laboratory experiments in artificial intelligence convinced many that fiction would soon become fact, and intelligent machines would soon relieve us of those tiresome tasks that require us to think.

So where are the intelligent machines now? They didn’t arrive fully formed like their fictional counterparts, but sneaked into our lives in the shape of AI programs in everyday applications. Google uses automatic class detection, an AI classification technique, to link documents to search terms. Not very exiciting maybe, but it’s been the search engines that have levered the web into everyday life. More recently, both Google and Microsoft are investing heavily in speech recognition software to enable voice-driven mobile search technology.

On a more familiar dystopian theme, the US government has a research programme on “sentiment analysis”; AI programs to automatically inspect publications in the US and abroad for unsympathetic or negative opinions of America. And, of course, there’s always robot wars.

Leave a Comment

George Orwell’s London today

George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four is one of the most celebrated dystopian fictions of the 2oth century. For the second half of the century the book has supplied a powerful counter to the development of a surveillance society. The term ‘Orwellian’ could always shrink the ambitions of control-hungry politicians. Orwell always maintained that Britain had no inbuilt resistance to growth of the sort of disciplinary state system he imagined in Nineteen Eighty-four. Indeed, he felt it would be so reassuringly British we would fail to recognize it (he expected it to be symbolized by the bowler hat and brolly rather than the jackboot). It is an irony then that his London homeplace is now surrounded by the sort of equipment Big Brother himself could only have dreamed of.

orwellmos3103_468x274-726813.jpg

It is a further irony that London authorities seek to adopt 1940s artistic genres to publicize their surveillance networks.

big brother

Above an image from a 1954 BBC dramatization, below a recently produced London poster.

watchful_eyes.jpg

Leave a Comment